Don’t dilute and delay AI rules, reinforce safeguards to protect consumers, warns report | Finance Watch

Don’t dilute and delay AI rules, reinforce safeguards to protect consumers, warns report

As industry pressure mounts, a new report from Finance Watch warns that postponing or weakening key provisions of the AI Act, particularly those covering high-risk systems, would leave consumers exposed to real and immediate harm. 

The new report ‘Protecting EU consumers in the age of AI-driven retail finance’, reveals how financial firms are already using AI systems to decide who gets a loan, how much people pay for insurance, and whether they can access a bank account, often with inadequate safeguards. 

As policymakers debate delaying or weakening the AI Act’s high-risk system rules in the name of competitiveness or simplification, Finance Watch cautions that any pause or dilution of the rules could undermine the EU’s ability to address urgent risks.

Delaying and weakening the AI Act’s rules for high-risk systems means leaving consumers unprotected. AI systems are already excluding people from vital services, rejecting legitimate insurance claims, and mis-selling unsuitable financial products. The risks aren’t theoretical, they are happening now and will only grow as AI adoption accelerates. And what’s framed as cutting red tape for firms often means cutting safety nets for consumers.

Peter Norwood, Senior Research & Advocacy Officer

The report warns that a patchwork of outdated laws, many predating the widespread use of AI, cannot deal with the opacity, lack of explainability, and personalisation of modern AI systems. Sectoral rules like the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD), and Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) were never designed to govern these technologies, and cannot offer the protections or redress consumers urgently need.

AI is reshaping access to finance, but Europe is relying on rules from another era. The EU should be reinforcing the rulebook, not tearing out pages. This includes expanding the scope of the AI Act, updating sectoral legislation, and introducing a dedicated AI liability regime to ensure consumers have a clear path to redress when things go wrong.

Peter Norwood, Senior Research & Advocacy Officer

Even if the AI Act is rolled out as scheduled, major blind spots remain. Key financial services like motor and home insurance, basic banking access, and retail investment advice still fall outside its core protections.

Trying to regulate AI in finance with the current sectoral framework is like fixing a leak with a sieve. Unless critical use cases are classified as high-risk under the AI Act, sectoral legislation is updated, and a proper liability regime is put in place, consumers will keep falling through the cracks.

Peter Norwood, Senior Research & Advocacy Officer

Contact

For press enquiries or to receive our press releases via email, please contact:

Max Kretschmer

Press Officer

[email protected]

+32 (0)2 899 04 38

Go to All press